Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Rodda v Repatriation Commission [2006] FCA 1689
DEFENCE AND WAR – veterans – entitlements – pensions for veterans – requirement of written authorisation for representation before Veterans' Review Board in relation to s 155AA notice – interpretation of s 155AA and s 155AC of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth) Held: Appeal dismissed Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth) s 155AA and s 155AC Project Blue Sky v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355 followed NOEL RODDA v REPATRIATION COMMISSION and PRINCIPAL MEMBER, VETERANS' REVIEW BOARD NSD 1328 of 2005 MADGWICK J 5 DECEMBER 2006 CANBERRA (HEARD IN SYDNEY) IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALESDISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1328 OF 2005
ON APPEAL FROM THE VETERANS' APPEALS DIVISION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL CONSTITUTED BY A SENIOR MEMBER
BETWEEN: NOEL RODDA
APPLICANT
AND: REPATRIATION COMMISSION
FIRST RESPONDENT
PRINCIPAL MEMBER, VETERANS' REVIEW BOARD
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MADGWICK J DATE OF ORDER: 5 DECEMBER 2006
WHERE MADE: CANBERRA (HEARD IN SYDNEY)
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed.
2. The applicant is to pay the first respondent's costs.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALESDISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1328 OF 2005
ON APPEAL FROM THE VETERANS' APPEALS DIVISION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL CONSTITUTED BY A SENIOR MEMBER
BETWEEN: NOEL RODDA
APPLICANT
AND: REPATRIATION COMMISSION
FIRST RESPONDENT
PRINCIPAL MEMBER, VETERANS' REVIEW BOARD
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MADGWICK J
DATE: 5 DECEMBER 2006
PLACE: CANBERRA (HEARD IN SYDNEY)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate