Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Blaikie [2006] FCA 1695
TAXATION – Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) – s 222ALA Payment Agreement between company and Deputy Commissioner of Taxation – default in making payment – whether director liable to pay penalty of total amount outstanding – whether director had reasonable grounds to expect company would comply with its obligations under the Agreement – Held: director did not have reasonable grounds to expect the company would comply with the Agreement – penalty in total amount outstanding payable by director BANKRUPTCY – Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) – personal insolvency agreement under Part X – Deputy Commissioner of Taxation ruled ineligible to vote – whether personal insolvency agreement should be set aside and a sequestration order made – Held: personal insolvency agreement should be set aside Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) Part X, ss 5, 188, 188A, 189, 196, 204, 222 Bankruptcy Legislation Amendment Act 2004 (Cth) Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) ss 222ALA, 222AQA(2), 222AQD Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) s 8
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Salcedo [2005] 2 Qd R 232 cited Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Saunig (2002) 55 NSWLR 722 cited DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION v WALTER WILLIAM DENNIS BLAIKIE AND GEOFFREY DAVID MCDONALD AS CONTROLLING TRUSTEE OF PROPERTY OF WALTER WILLIAM DENNIS BLAIKIE NSD 865 OF 2006
BRANSON J
7 DecemBER 2006
SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 865 OF 2006
BETWEEN: DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
Applicant
AND: WALTER WILLIAM DENNIS BLAIKIE
First Respondent
GEOFFREY DAVID MCDONALD AS CONTROLLING TRUSTEE OF PROPERTY OF WALTER WILLIAM DENNIS BLAIKIE
Second Respondent
JUDGE: BRANSON J DATE OF ORDER: 7 DECEMBER 2006
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate