Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Commissioner of Taxation v Dixon Consulting Pty Limited [2006] FCA 1748
INCOME TAX – personal services income declaration – whether the respondent company met the business premises test – whether the company had exclusive use of the premises – whether the premises the company used were physically separate from any premises used by the family for private purposes ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review – whether Tribunal misinterpreted the requirement for exclusive use – whether Tribunal took irrelevant considerations into account and failed to take relevant considerations into account- whether Tribunal misconstrued the word "premises" Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44 Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) ss 87-15, 87-30 Macquarie Dictionary, 4th ed, The Macquarie Library Pty Ltd, Macquarie, 2005 Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, 5th ed, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002 COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION v DIXON CONSULTING PTY LIMITED NSD652 OF 2006
EMMETT J
15 DECEMBER 2006
SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD652 OF 2006
ON APPEAL FROM THE TAXATION APPEALS DIVISION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL CONSTITUTED BY
BETWEEN: COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
Appellant
AND: DIXON CONSULTING PTY LIMITED
Respondent
JUDGE: EMMETT J
DATE OF ORDER: 15 DECEMBER 2006
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal ('the Tribunal') be set aside. 2. The matter be remitted to the Tribunal for further consideration according to law. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD652 OF 2006
ON APPEAL FROM THE TAXATION APPEALS DIVISION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL CONSTITUTED BY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate