Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
eBay International AG v Creative Festival Entertainment Pty Limited (ACN 098 183 281) [2006] FCA 1768 CONTRACT – general contractual principles – construction and interpretation of contracts – offer and acceptance – organiser of major music festival – admission tickets sold through various methods purporting to contain condition providing for cancellation of ticket if resold for profit – where resales of tickets through online market or auction sites sought to be specifically prohibited by condition of purchase - where terms and conditions not drawn to the attention of purchasers in some instances – where terms and conditions of sale differed from those on ticket in some instances - whether condition of no resale for profit incorporated into contract TRADE AND COMMERCE – Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) and related legislation – consumer protection – misleading and deceptive conduct or false representations – organiser of major music festival – admission tickets sold through various methods purporting to contain condition providing for cancellation of ticket if resold for profit – where resales of tickets through online market or auction sites sought to be specifically prohibited by condition of purchase - where terms and conditions not drawn to the attention of purchasers in some instances – whether representation that condition prohibiting resale for profit was enforceable is misleading and deceptive Held – the relevant condition conveys a misleading representation that Creative is legally entitled to and would detect and cancel any ticket which is resold for profit and the holder of that ticket would be refused entry; applicant entitled to relief in the form of a declaration and injunction. WORDS & PHRASES – "for profit" Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 52 Campomar Sociedad, Limitada v Nike International Ltd (2000) 202 CLR 45 applied Cowell v Rosehill Racecourse Company Ltd (1937) 56 CLR 605 cited Darlington Futures Ltd v Delco Australia Pty Ltd (1986) 161 CLR 500 applied Gange v Sullivan (1966) 116 CLR 418 cited Heatley v Tasmanian Racing and Gaming Commission (1977) 137 CLR 487 cited Hospitality Group Pty Ltd v Australian Rugby Union Ltd (2001) 110 FCR 157 applied Lewis v Daily Telegraph Ltd [1964] AC 234applied MacRobertson Miller Airline Services v Commissioner of State Taxation (WA) (1975) 133 CLR 125 considered Oceanic Sun Line Special Shipping Company Inc v Fay (1988) 165 CLR 197 applied Quinn Villages Pty Ltd v Mulherin [2006] QCA 433 cited RAIA Insurance Brokers Ltd v FAI General Insurance Ltd (1993) 41 FCR 164 cited Suttor v Gundowda Pty Ltd (1950) 81 CLR 418cited Sydney Corporation v West (1965) 114 CLR 481 followed Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking Ltd [1971] 2 QB 163 cited Toll (FGCT) Pty Limited v Alphapharm Pty Limited (2004) 219 CLR 165 applied/followed Zhu v Treasurer of NSW (2004) 218 CLR 530applied/followed EBAY INTERNATIONAL AG v CREATIVE FESTIVAL ENTERTAINMENT PTY LIMITED (ACN 098 183 281) NSD 2191 OF 2006
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate