Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Walker v State of Queensland [2006] FCA 1769 EILEEN WALKER, HAZEL DOUGLAS, PETER FISCHER, RAYMOND PIERCE, AGNES WALKER AND JOHN WALKER JNR ON BEHALF OF THE YALANJI PEOPLES v STATE OF QUEENSLAND, COOK SHIRE COUNCIL, DOUGLAS SHIRE COUNCIL, WUJAL WUJAL ABORIGINAL COUNCIL, ERGON ENERGY CORPORATION LIMITED, TELSTRA CORPORATION LTD, BURUNGU ABORIGINAL CORPORATION, RUSSELL DAVID O'DOHERTY, ODETTE CATHERINE PHILLPOT, ARNFRIED BRENDECKE, VERNON JOHN GOODYEAR, TERRY ANNE ROGERS, KEVIN JOHN BRANDT, ROBERT ALFRED HARLOW, ANDREW ALAN MARSHALL AND RODERICK WILLIAM MCLEAN QUD 6008 OF 1998
ALLSOP J
14 DECEMBER 2006
SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY QUD 6008 OF 1998
BETWEEN: EILEEN WALKER, HAZEL DOUGLAS, PETER FISCHER, RAYMOND PIERCE, AGNES WALKER AND JOHN WALKER JNR ON BEHALF OF THE YALANJI PEOPLES
Applicant
AND: STATE OF QUEENSLAND
First Respondent
COOK SHIRE COUNCIL
Second Respondent
DOUGLAS SHIRE COUNCIL
Third Respondent
WUJAL WUJAL ABORIGINAL COUNCIL
Fourth Respondent
ERGON ENERGY CORPORATION LIMITED
Fifth Respondent
TELSTRA CORPORATION LTD
Sixth Respondent
BURUNGU ABORIGINAL CORPORATION
Seventh Respondent
RUSSELL DAVID O'DOHERTY
Eighth Respondent
ODETTE CATHERINE PHILLPOT
Ninth Respondent
ARNFRIED BRENDECKE
Tenth Respondent
VERNON JOHN GOODYEAR
Eleventh Respondent
TERRY ANNE ROGERS
Twelfth Respondent
KEVIN JOHN BRANDT
Thirteenth Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate