Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ranbaxy Australia Pty Ltd v Warner-Lambert Company LLC (No 2) [2006] FCA 1787
PATENTS - construction of patent - principles of construction - skilled addressee - composition of a team skilled in the relevant field of art - common general knowledge - patent not restricted to racemate PATENTS - revocation of later patent – selection patent - whether patent obtained by false suggestion or misrepresentation - whether claimed invention is a patentable invention - whether claimed invention is a manner of manufacture within the meaning of Statute of Monopolies - whether claimed invention is useful Patents Act 1990 (Cth) ss 3, 18(1), 18(1)(a), 18(1)(c), 138(3)(b), 234, Sch 1 Patents Act 1952 (Cth) ss 100(1)(d), 100(1)(e), 100(1)(h) Patents Act 1903 (Cth)
Welch Perrin & Co Pty Ltd v Worrel (1961) 106 CLR 588 applied Interlego AG v Toltoys Pty Ltd (1973) 130 CLR 461 applied Décor Corp Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1988) 13 IPR 385 applied Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Pty Ltd v Avion Engineering Pty Ltd (1991) 22 IPR 1 cited Fresenius Medical Care Australia Pty Ltd v Gambro Pty Ltd (2005) 67 IPR 230 cited Pfizer Overseas Pharmaceuticals v Ely Lilly & Co (2005) 68 IPR 1 applied Kirin-Amgen Inc v Hoechst Marion Roussel Ltd (2004) 64 IPR 444 applied PhotoCure ASA v Queen's University at Kingston (2005) 216 ALR 41 applied Sachtler GmbH & Co KG v RE Miller Pty Ltd (2005) 221 ALR 373 applied Clorox Australia Pty Ltd v International Consolidated Business Pty Ltd (2006) 68 IPR 254 applied Nesbit Evans Group Australia Pty Ltd v Impro Ltd (1997) 39 IPR 56 cited Root Quality Pty Ltd v Root Control (2000) 49 IPR 225 approved The General Tire & Rubber Company v The Firestone Tyre and Rubber Company Limited [1972] RPC 457 cited NSI Dental Pty Ltd v University of Melbourne (2006) 69 IPR 542 approved Aktiebolaget Hassle v Alphapharm Pty Ltd (2002) 212 CLR 411 cited Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co v Beiersdorf (Aust) Ltd (1980) 144 CLR 253 approved W R Grace & Co v Asahi Kasei Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha (1993) 25 IPR 481 approved Asahi Kasei Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha v W R Grace & Co (1991) 22 IPR 491 cited NutraSweet Australia Pty Ltd v Ajinomoto Co Inc (2005) 67 IPR 381 cited Ranbaxy (UK) Ltd v Warner-Lambert Company [2006] EWCA 876 considered Houssein v Under Secretary, Department of Industrial Relations and Technology (NSW) (1982) 148 CLR 88 cited Wentworth v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 239 cited Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v FH Faulding and Co Limited (2000) 97 FCR 524 explained FAI Traders Insurance Co Ltd v Savoy Plaza Pty Ltd [1993] 2 VLR 437 cited Pfizer Inc v Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited 457 F3d 1284 (2006) considered Ranbaxy UK Limited v Warner-Lambert Company [2005] EWHC 2142 cited Pfizer Inc v Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd 405 FSupp2d 495 (D Del 2005) cited Pfizer Canada Inc v The Minister of Health [2006] FC 1471 cited Commissioner of Patents v Microcell Ltd (1959) 102 CLR 232 applied NV Philips Gloeilampenfabrieken v Mirabella International Pty Ltd (1995) 183 CLR 655 applied NV Philips Gloeilampenfabrieken v Mirabella International Pty Ltd (1993) 44 FCR 239 applied ICI Chemicals & Polymers Ltd v The Lubrizol Corporation Inc (2000) 106 FCR 214 cited Advanced Building Systems Pty Limited v Ramset Fasteners (Aust) Pty Limited (1998) 194 CLR 171 considered National Research Development Corporation v Commissioner of Patents (1959) 102 CLR 252 applied Sunbeam Corporation v Morphy-Richards (Aust) Pty Ltd (1961) 180 CLR 98 considered Merck & Co Inc v Arrow Pharmaceuticals Ltd (2006) 68 IPR 511 considered Wm Wrigley Jr Company v Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd (2005) 66 IPR 298 considered Prestige Group (Australia) Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1990) 19 IPR 275 approved JMVB Enterprises Pty Ltd v Camoflag Pty Ltd (2005) 67 IPR 68 approved Rehm Pty Ltd v Webster's Security Systems (International) Pty Ltd (1981) 81 ALR 79 applied Old Digger Pty Ltd v Azuko Pty Ltd [2000] FCA 676 approved Alsop's Patent (1907) 24 RPC 733 approved Lane-Fox v Kensington & Knightsbridge Electric Lighting Co Ltd [1892] 3 Ch 424 cited Hatmaker v Joseph Nathan Co Ltd (1919) 36 RPC 231 cited IG Farbenindustrie AG's Patents (1930) 47 RPC 289 applied May & Baker Ltd v Boots Pure Drug Co Ltd(1948) 65 RPC 255 approved E.I. Du Pont Nemours & Co (Witsiepe's) Application [1982] FSR 303 cited Badische Anilin Und & Soda Fabrik v Levinstein(1887) 4 RPC 449 approved
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate