Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Angelakos v Secretary, Department of Employment and Workplace Relations [2007] FCA 25
SOCIAL SECURITY – appeal from decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal – where applicant overpaid parenting payment under Social Security Act 1991 (Cth) – where Tribunal member found no special circumstances arose and rejected claim for waiver of debt – whether Tribunal member applied correct legal test – meaning of 'special circumstances' – whether Tribunal member took an irrelevant matter into account by having regard to applicant's interest in real property and superannuation benefits payable in the future – whether Tribunal member failed to take into account a relevant matter in that the applicant had changed his financial position as a result of the overpayment. Held: 'special circumstances' distinguishable from the ordinary or usual case – Tribunal member applied correct test in circumstances – Tribunal member was entitled to consider applicant's interest in property and superannuation fund in considering the applicant's capacity to repay debt – Tribunal member did not fail to take into account a relevant matter – appeal dismissed. Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44 Social Security Act 1991 (Cth) ss 1223, 1236, 1237 Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (Cth) Beadle, Re v Director-General of Social Security (1984) 6 ALD 1 considered Beadle v Director-General of Social Security (1985) 60 ALR 225 considered Copperart Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1993) 26 ATR 327 cited David Securities Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia Ltd (1992) 175 CLR 353 cited Dranichnikov v Centrelink (2003) 53 ATR 270, considered Groth v Secretary, Department of Social Security (1995) 40 ALD 541 considered Giumelli v Giumelli (1999) 196 CLR 101 cited Jess v Scott (1986) 12 FCR 187 considered Lipkin Gorman (a firm) v Karpnale Ltd [1991] 2 AC 548 cited Plimmer v Wellington Corporation (1884) 9 App Cases 699 cited Riddell v Secretary, Department of Social Security (1993) 30 ALD 31 considered Ryde v Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services [2005] FCA 866 considered Secretary, Department of Social Security v Hales (1998) 82 FCR 154 considered TNT Skypak International (Aust) Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1988) 19 ATR 1067 cited Waltons Stores (Interstate) Ltd v Maher (1988) 164 CLR 387 cited GEORGE ANGELAKOS v SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND WORKPLACE RELATIONS SAD 58 OF 2006
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate