Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Oke v Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police [2007] FCA 27
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – powers of search and seizure – Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) – s 3E search warrant - copy of search warrant made available to occupier pursuant to s 3H(1) incomplete - whether execution of warrant unlawful because the copy provided to the occupier did not contain the name of the issuing officer and the time at which the warrant expired – whether execution of search warrant unlawful because the copy provided to the occupier did not have attached the guidelines for claiming legal professional privilege ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – powers of search and seizure – Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) – s 3E search warrant – seizure of laptop computer - whether executing officer had reasonable grounds for suspecting laptop contained evidential material – where contents of laptop computer not inspected prior to seizure LEGAL PROFESSIONAL PRIVILEGE – powers of search and seizure – Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) – s 3E search warrant – validity of execution of search warrant - guidelines for treatment of claims of legal professional privilege - whether possible to lawfully seize an item the subject of a disputed claim of legal professional privilege – where documents the subject of a claim of legal professional privilege inspected by Australian Federal Police during execution of search warrant HELD: Execution of search warrant unlawful for non compliance with s 3H Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) Crimes (Search Warrants and Powers of Arrest) Amendment Act 1994 (Cth) Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) Baker v Campbell (1983) 153 CLR 52 followed Seeter Pty Ltd v Commonwealth (2004) 210 ALR 437 distinguished Saunders v Commissioner, Australian Federal Police (1998) 86 FCR 51 referred to Ousley v The Queen (1997) 192 CLR 69 referred to Arno v Forsyth (1986) 9 FCR 576 cited Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355 referred to Hart v Commissioner of Australian Federal Police (2002) 124 FCR 384 considered Lawrie v Muir [1950] SLT 37 referred to George v Rockett (1990) 170 CLR 104 referred to Woodroffe v National Crime Authority [1999] FCA 591 referred to Harts Australia Ltd v Commissioner, Australia Federal Police (1997) 75 FCR 145 referred to Wright v Queensland Police Service [2002] 2 Qd R 667 distinguished Australian Airlines Ltd (1991) 28 FCR 360 cited JMA Accounting Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2004] FCAFC 274 considered Commissioner for Australian Federal Police v Propend Finance Pty Ltd (1997) 188 CLR 501 referred to Saunders v Commissioner, Australian Federal Police (1998) 160 ALR 469 referred to
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate