Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Epenisa v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2007] FCA 80
MIGRATION – appeal from decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirming decision of delegate of first respondent Minister to cancel applicant's visa – where applicant citizen of New Zealand holding special category visa in Australia – where applicant convicted of serious criminal offences – where Minister cancelled applicant's visa pursuant to s 501(2) of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – where applicant purported to appeal under s 44 of Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) – whether appeal under Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act competent – whether power conferred by s 501(2) of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) limited or supplanted by terms of s 200 and s 201 of the Act – whether power to cancel visa exercised used for punitive purpose – whether Tribunal member failed to give proper consideration to relevant matters – whether Tribunal member took expectations of Australian community into account.
Held – appeal under s 44 of Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) incompetent – decision excluded from scope of s 44 even if in excess of jurisdiction or resulting from failure to exercise jurisdiction – s 501 of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) not limited by s 200 and s 201 – no evidence Tribunal member exercised power for improper or punitive purpose – Tribunal member gave proper consideration to matters identified by applicant – Tribunal member did take expectations of Australian community into account – appeal dismissed. Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5, 5E, 501, 476A, 483 Migration Litigation Reform Act 2005 (Cth) Anthony Hordern and Sons Ltd v Amalgamated Clothing and Allied Trades Union of Australia(1932) 47 CLR 1 considered Djalic v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2004) 139 FCR 292 applied Hoffman v Chief of Army (2004) 137 FCR 520 referred to Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Limited (1986) 162 CLR 24 referred to Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs, Re; Ex parte Applicant S20/2002 (2003) 77 ALJR 1165 referred to Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v Nystrom (2006) 81 ALJR 1 followed Minister for Immigration v Bhardwaj (2002) 209 CLR 597 referred to Plaintiff S157/2002 v The Commonwealth of Australia (2003) 211 CLR 476 referred to Pull v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2007] FCA 20 referred to Shaw v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2003) 218 CLR 28 referred to FEOFAAKI EPENISA v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS AND ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL SAD 56 OF 2006
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate