Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
The Food Improvers Pty Limited v BGR Corporation Pty Ltd (No 3) [2007] FCA 97 CORPORATIONS – membership, rights and remedies – members' remedies and internal disputes – oppressive or unfair conduct – what constitutes – conduct of, or relating to directions – where closely held corporation – whether majority shareholder engaged in oppressive conduct within the meaning of s 232 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – whether winding up just and equitable under s 461(1)(k) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – removal of minority shareholder from position of director – exclusion from decision-making and cessation of payment for work performed in executive capacity – destruction of quasi-partnership relationship – company paying for legal fees for majority in defence of minority claim PRACTICE – jurisdiction – inherent jurisdiction – officers and processes of court – restraining solicitors from acting – right of audience – solicitor a material witness – beneficial pecuniary interest in outcome of litigation – where motion to enjoin solicitor from acting filed and solicitor continued to act LEGAL PRACTITIONERS – solicitors – proceedings on behalf of client – solicitor a material witness – evidence and conduct likely to be scrutinised – beneficial pecuniary interest in outcome of litigation – where motion to enjoin solicitor from acting filed and solicitor continued to act Held – corporation's affairs found to be conducted in a manner oppressive to minority shareholder; just and equitable to wind up corporation Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 232, 233, 461(1)(k) Dynasty Pty Ltd v Coombs (1995) 59 FCR 122 applied Ebrahimi v Westbourne Galleries Ltd [1973] AC 360 applied Fexuto Pty Ltd v Bosnjak Holdings Pty Ltd (2001) 37 ACSR 672 applied In re A Company [1999] 1 WLR 1092 considered Kallinicos v Hunt (2005) 64 NSWLR 561 considered Re DG Brims & Sons Pty Ltd (1995) 16 ACSR 559 cited Scottish Meyer Cooperative Wholesale Society Ltd v Meyer [1959] AC 324 cited Tay Bok Choon v Tahansan Sdn Bhd [1987] 1 WLR 413 applied Wayde v New South Wales Rugby League Ltd (1985) 180 CLR 459 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate