Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NBKE v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2007] FCA 126 MIGRATION – protection visa – nationality of visa applicant – Tribunal determined nationality on the basis that visa applicant held an Indonesian passport – claim that bogus marriage in Indonesia did not result in the acquisition of Indonesian nationality and the loss of Chinese nationality – claim that Indonesian passport was obtained under false pretences – whether Tribunal considered all the visa applicant's claims Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 424A(1), s 427(1)(d) Htun v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2001) 194 ALR 244 Applicant WAEE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 184 Applicant M164/2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCAFC 16 NBKE v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & CITIZENSHIP AND REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL NSD 1234 OF 2006
SIOPIS J
15 February 2007
SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1234 OF 2006
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: NBKE
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: SIOPIS J
DATE OF ORDER: 15 February 2007
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1 The name of the first respondent is varied to 'Minister for Immigration & Citizenship'. 2 The appeal is allowed. 3 The decision of the Federal Magistrate dated 15 June 2006 is set aside. 4 The appellant's application for review of the decision of the delegate of the first respondent is remitted to the Refugee Review Tribunal to be determined according to law. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate