Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Rogers v Asset Loan Co Pty Ltd & Ors [2007] FCA 195 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – consideration of an application to extend time for the filing and service of a notice of appeal – consideration of whether the judgment appealed from is an interlocutory or final judgment – consideration of an application for summary dismissal of the proceedings under both s 31A of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) and Order 20, rule 2 of the Federal Court Rules – consideration of the relationship between approaches to the striking out of a pleading and entering summary judgment pursuant to either s 31A of the Act or Order 20, rule 2 of the Federal Court Rules. BANKRUPTCY – consideration of the nature of a claim falling within the exemption contained in s 116(2)(g) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) and whether the applicant in the proceedings has standing to maintain the particular claim.
Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – s 24(1), s 24(1A), s 25 Federal Court Rules – Order 52, rule 10; Order 52, rule 15(1); Order 52, rule 15(2) Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) – s 116(2)(g) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) – ss 52, 51AA, 60, 82, 87(1D)
Rogers v Asset Loan Co Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 1708 - quoted Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Fox Symes & Associates Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 1071 - cited Trade Practices Commission v Australian Iron and Steel Pty Limited (1989) 22 FCR 305 - cited Rogers v Asset Loan Co Pty Ltd & Ors [2006] FCA 434 - quoted Munnings v Australian Government Solicitor (1994) 120 ALR 586 - cited Tampion v Anderson (1974) 3 ALR 414 - cited Hall v Nominal Defendant (1966) 117 CLR 423 - cited Little v Victoria (1998) 4 VR 596 - cited Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1 - cited Platypus Leasing Inc & Ors v Commissioner of Taxation [2005] NSWCA 399 - cited Johnston v Cameron (2002) 124 FCR 160 - cited Port of Melbourne Authority v Ashun Pty Limited (1980) 147 CLR 35 - cited Décor Corp Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 - cited Ogawa v University of Melbourne (No. 2) [2004] FCA 1275 - cited Jess v Scott and Others (1986) 12 FCR 187 - cited Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Maritime Union of Australia (2001) 114 FCR 427 - cited Cox v Journeaux (No. 2) (1935) 52 CLR 713 - cited Beckham v Drake (1849) 2 HLC 579 - cited Wilson v United Counties Bank Ltd (1920) AC 102 - cited Faulkner v Bluett (1981) 52 FLR 115 - cited Bryant v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1997) 75 FCR 545 - cited Mannigel v Hewlett Phelps BC9101907 - cited Daemar v Industrial Commission of New South Wales & Ors (1988) 79 ALR 591 - cited Fortron Automotive Treatments Pty Ltd v Jones (No. 2) (2006) FCA 1401 - cited Duncan v Lipscombe Child Care Services Inc [2006] FCA 458 - cited General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125 - cited Batistatos v Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales (2006) 227 ALR 425 - cited Agar v Hyde (2000) 201 CLR 552 - cited Boston Commercial Services Pty Ltd v GE Capital Finance Australasia Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 1352 – cited GREGORY ERIC ROGERS v ASSET LOAN CO PTY LTD, ASSET LOAN COMPANY PTY LTD, PAUL ALEXANDER SYDNEY HARE, RUSSELL FRANK PERCIVAL, JUDITH LORRAINE HARE AND RIVERSTONE NOMINEES PTY LTD CAN QUD504 OF 2006
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate