Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Natural Waters of Viti Limited v Dayals (Fiji) Artesian Waters Limited [2007] FCA 200 TRADE PRACTICES – packaging of respondents' bottled water alleged to resemble applicants' "get-up" so as to be misleading and deceptive – reputation – individual features of the applicants' get-up not unique – no evidence of consumer association – differences between get-up in 2003 and 2005 – reputation found in the 2003 get-up as a result of sales and marketing – reputation extends to common elements in 2005 get-up – relevance of respondents' intention – respondents adopted different devices in use in the marketplace without intending to mislead or deceive – packaging and get-up materially different – no likelihood of deception – application dismissed TORTS – passing off – no intention to pass off – packaging and get-up materially different – application dismissed
Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ss 52 and 53 Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) ss 42 and 44 Anheuser-Busch v Budějovický Budvar (2002) 56 IPR 182 cited Apand Pty Ltd v Kettle Chip Company Pty Ltd (1994) 52 FCR 474 cited Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd v Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops Pty Ltd (2006) 228 ALR 719 cited Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd v Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops Pty Ltd (No 4) (2006) 229 ALR 136 cited Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd v Pub Squash Co Pty Ltd [1980] 2 NSWLR 851 cited Campomar Sociedad, Limitada v Nike International Limited (2000) 202 CLR 45 applied Collins Debden Pty Ltd v Cumberland Stationery Co Pty Ltd (No 2) [2005] FCA 1398 cited Interlego AG v Croner Trading Pty Limited (1992)39 FCR 348 cited Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 cited Kettle Chip Company Pty Ltd v Apand Pty Ltd (1993) 46 FCR 152 cited McCormick & Co Inc v McCormick (2000) 51 IPR 102 cited Pacific Publications Pty Ltd v Next Publishing Pty Ltd (2005) 222 ALR 127 cited Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd v Puxu Pty Ltd (1982) 149 CLR 191 cited Reckitt & Colman Products Ltd v Borden Inc (1990) 17 IPR 1 cited Red Bull Australia Pty Ltd v Sydneywide Distributors Pty Ltd (2001) 53 IPR 481 cited Remy Martin v Carlton Wines & Spirits (Aust) Pty Ltd (unreported, O'Loughlin J, 19 February 1992) considered Sterling Winthrop Pty Limited v R & C Products Pty Ltd (1994) ATPR 41,308 cited Sydneywide Distributors Pty Ltd v Red Bull Australia Pty Ltd (2002) 55 IPR 354 considered TGI Friday's Australia Pty Ltd v TGI Friday's Inc (1999) 45 IPR 43 cited The Shell Co of Australia Ltd v Esso Standard Oil (Australia) Ltd (1963) 109 CLR 407 cited NATURAL WATERS OF VITI LIMITED AND FIJI WATER (AUSTRALIA) PTY LIMITED (ACN 103 806 668) v DAYALS (FIJI) ARTESIAN WATERS LIMITED, PRANESH DAYAL AND JAY PRAKASH DAYAL NSD 658 OF 2006
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate