Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZAYH v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 218 SZAYH v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP AND REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL NSD 2312 OF 2006
MOORE J
27 FEBRUARY 2007
SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 2312 OF 2006
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZAYH
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: MOORE J DATE OF ORDER: 27 FEBRUARY 2007
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application for leave to appeal be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs. 3. The Refugee Review Tribunal be added as second respondent. 4. The name of the first respondent be amended to the 'Minister for Immigration and Citizenship'.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 2312 OF 2006
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZAYH
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: MOORE J
DATE: 27 FEBRUARY 2007
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 This is an application for leave to appeal against a judgment of a Federal Magistrate of 7 November 2006: see SZAYH v Minister for Immigration (No 2) [2005] FMCA 1764. His Honour found that the application for judicial review had no prospects of success and dismissed it as an abuse of process. His Honour also directed that no further order for review of the decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal of 17 June 2003 or for review of the decision of the delegate of the first respondent of 24 May 2002 or for review of any notification of those decisions be accepted for filing without prior leave of the Court. Those orders were made against a background of extensive litigation in the Federal Magistrates Court, this Court and the High Court: see SZAYH v Minister for Immigration [2004] FMCA 771, SZAYH v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 4, SZAYH v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] HCATrans 353, SZAYH v Minister for Immigration [2005] FMCA 1122, SZAYH v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1414, SZAYH v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCA 240, SZAYH v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] HCATrans 556. 2 In my opinion it was well open to the Federal Magistrate to dismiss the application as he did having regard to the history of that litigation. Any appeal against that judgment has no prospects of success. Accordingly I dismiss the application for leave to appeal and order that the applicant pay the first respondent's costs. I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Moore.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate