Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Peek v CEO, Australian Government Solicitor (No. 5) [2007] FCA 222
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - judicial review of administrative decision making – decision pursuant to s 36(3) of the Safety Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth) – discretion of Court under s 10(2)(b) of the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) where review in another tribunal is being pursued – decision pursuant to s 41A of the Safety Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth) Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) ss 5, 6, 10, 16, Sch 1, cl (za) Safety Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth) ss 36, 38, 41A, 57 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 55ZA Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 cited Comcare v Sassella [2001] FCA 1514; (2001) 34 AAR 142 approved Wyeth Australia Pty Ltd v Minister for Health & Aged Care (2000) 61 ALD 372; [2000] FCA 330cited GREGORY JAMES PEEK v CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT SOLICITOR AND MEGAN PITT NSD 880 OF 2005
EDMONDS J
1 March 2007
SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 880 OF 2005
BETWEEN: GREGORY JAMES PEEK
Applicant
AND: CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT SOLICITOR
First Respondent
MEGAN PITT
Second Respondent
JUDGE: EDMONDS J DATE OF ORDER: 1 March 2007
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application be dismissed. 2. The respondents be released from their undertakings to the Court made 8 June 2005. 3. The applicant pay the respondents' costs of the application and all motions on notice. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 880 OF 2005
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate