Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission v Boothman [2007] FCA 301
WORKER'S COMPENSATION – entitlement to compensation – appeal from decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal – claim for compensation in relation to motor vehicle accident– whether respondent would have been entitled to compensation under Compensation (Commonwealth Government Employees) Act 1971 (Cth)– where respondent was a member of the army at time of accident – where respondent was on leave between postings – where respondent had never worked at location of next posting – whether location of next posting was respondent's 'place of employment' within the meaning of s 34 of the Act – whether respondent was at liberty to absent himself from place of employment – where respondent was travelling by private motor vehicle at time of accident – whether respondent used 'last means of transport' within the meaning of s 34(4)(b) of the Act. Held – open to Tribunal member to conclude that respondent was travelling to his place of employment at the time of the accident – respondent was at liberty to absent himself from his place of employment – private motor vehicle can amount to last means of transport within the meaning of s 34 of the Act – respondent's journey fell within terms of s 34 of the Act – appeal dismissed. Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 15AB Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44 Compensation (Commonwealth Government Employees) Act 1971 (Cth)ss 27, 32, 33, 34, 36 Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth) s 124 Collector of Customs v Pozzolanic Enterprises Pty Ltd (1993) 43 FCR 280 cited Commonwealth of Australia v Duncan (1982) 44 ALR 249 considered James, Re; and Commonwealth of Australia [1983], AAT, N81/272 (Unreported, R K Todd, 6 July 1983) cited Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 cited Maunder v Commonwealth of Australia (1983) 51 ALR 44 considered Victims Compensation Fund Corporation v Brown (2003) 77 ALJR 1797 considered MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION COMMISSION v ERNEST BOOTHMAN WAD 235 OF 2005
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate