Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZGLU v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2007] FCA 363 MIGRATION − alleged failure by the Refugee Review Tribunal to consider claims in protection visa application − whether claims abandoned by the appellant at the Tribunal hearing − no jurisdictional error − appeal dismissed NABE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (No 2) (2004) 144 FCR 1 cited SZEIV v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCA 1798 cited SZGLU v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP AND REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL NSD 2254 OF 2006
BENNETT J
21 FEBRUARY 2007
SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 2254 OF 2006
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZGLU
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: BENNETT J
DATE OF ORDER: 21 FEBRUARY 2007
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT: 1. Grants leave to the appellant to file in Court an Amended Notice of Appeal in the form of the document titled Supplementary Notice of Appeal. THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 2. The name of the first respondent be changed to the 'Minister for Immigration and Citizenship'. 3. The Refugee Review Tribunal is joined as the second respondent. 4. The appeal is dismissed. 5. The appellant is to pay the first respondent's costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 2254 OF 2006
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZGLU
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate