Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Raikua v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2007] FCA 370
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 417 – Minister's power to substitute a more favourable decision than that given by Refugee Review Tribunal – request and repeat request by woman to Minister that Minister's power be exercised in favour of herself and her children – Ministerial guidelines to effect that Minister did not wish to have repeat requests referred to Minister if Departmental officer should be of a certain opinion – applicants' repeat request not referred to Minister – provision of s 417(7) that Minister does not have a duty to consider whether to exercise the power – whether decisions of Minister and a Manager of Ministerial Interventions Unit within Department subject to judicial review – Held: No. MIGRATION – Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 417 – Minister's power to substitute a more favourable decision than that given by Refugee Review Tribunal – request and repeat request by woman to Minister that Minister's power be exercised in favour of herself and her children – Ministerial guidelines to effect that Minister did not wish to have repeat requests referred to Minister if Departmental officer should be of a certain opinion – applicants' repeat request not referred to Minister – provision of s 417(7) that Minister does not have a duty to consider whether to exercise the power – whether decisions of Minister and a Manager of Ministerial Interventions Unit within Department subject to judicial review – Held: No. Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 417, 474, 476, 476A Applicant S1083 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 295 cited Applicant S1510 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 294 cited Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 cited Bedlington v Chong (1998) 87 FCR 75 followed Carltona Ltd v Commissioners of Works [1943] 2 All ER 560 discussed Din v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1997) 147 ALR 673 discussed Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Ozmanian (1996) 71 FCR 1 discussed Ozmanian v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1996) 137 ALR 103 discussed Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth of Australia (2003) 211 CLR 476 considered S1083 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 1455 followed Savouts v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1059 followed ASILIKA RAIKUA AND ORS v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS AND ORS NSD 948 OF 2006
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate