Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Applicant S285 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 400
MIGRATION – whether an extension of time within which to seek leave to appeal should be granted to the applicant – respondent urged that leave not be granted on the basis that any appeal would have no prospects at all of success – Held: application dismissed Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 477 Migration Litigation Reform Act 2005 (Cth) items 40 and 42 of Part 2 of Schedule 1 Federal Court Rules O 32 r 2 APPLICANT S285 OF 2003 v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP, REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL AND COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA NSD 1699 OF 2006
BRANSON J
14 FEBRUARY 2007
SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1699 OF 2006
BETWEEN: APPLICANT S285 OF 2003
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
Third Respondent
JUDGE: BRANSON J
DATE OF ORDER: 14 FEBRUARY 2007
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. To the extent necessary, the respondents have leave to proceed in this matter in the absence of the applicant. 2. The name of the first respondent be amended to Minister for Immigration and Citizenship. 3. The third respondent be removed as a party from the proceeding. 4. The application be dismissed. 5. The applicant pay the first respondent's costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1699 OF 2006
BETWEEN: APPLICANT S285 OF 2003
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate