Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Harris v Secretary, Department of Employment and Workplace Relations [2007] FCA 404
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – eligibility for disability support pension – AAT should not have rejected claim because of absence of further hypothetical third party investigations – investigative role of decision maker SOCIAL SECURITY – eligibility for disability support pension – whether conditions investigated, treated and stablised in absence of further hypothetical third party investigations – investigative role of decision maker Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth), s 33, s 44 Social Security Act 1991 (Cth), s 94, Schedule 1B Social Security Administration Act 1999 (Cth), s 42, Schedule 2 Clements v Independent Indigenous Advisory Committee (2003) 131 FCR 28 referred to Luu v Renevier (1989) 91 ALR 39 applied McDonald v Director-General of Social Security (1984) 1 FCR 354followed Prasad v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1985) 6 FCR 155 applied
INGRID HARRIS v SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND WORKPLACE RELATIONS NSD 1308 OF 2006
GYLES J
22 march 2007
SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1308 OF 2006
ON APPEAL FROM THE GENERAL DIVISION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL CONSTITUTED BY SENIOR MEMBER MD ALLEN, MEMBER AND DR MEC THORPE, MEMBER
BETWEEN: INGRID HARRIS
Applicant
AND: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND WORKPLACE RELATIONS
Respondent
JUDGE: GYLES J DATE OF ORDER: 22 march 2007
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal be set aside. 2. The matter be remitted to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal to be dealt with according to law. 3. The respondent pay the costs of the applicant of the appeal.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate