Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZBTB v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 456 SZBTB, SZBTC AND SZBTD v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP AND REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL NSD 195 OF 2007
MOORE J
27 MARCH 2007
SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 195 OF 2007
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZBTB
First Applicant
SZBTC
Second Applicant
SZBTD
Third Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: MOORE J DATE OF ORDER: 27 MARCH 2007
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Leave to appeal be refused if leave be necessary. 2. The appeal otherwise be dismissed. 3. The applicant pay the first respondent's costs fixed in the sum of $1000. 4. The name of the first respondent be amended to "Minister for Immigration and Citizenship". Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 195 OF 2007
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZBTB
First Applicant
SZBTC
Second Applicant
SZBTD
Third Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: MOORE J
DATE: 27 MARCH 2007
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 This purports to be an appeal against a judgment of a Federal Magistrate of 24 January 2007. His Honour dismissed an application filed in that Court on 10 November 2006 as an abuse of process. Those proceedings sought to challenge a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal of 26 October 2006, determining it had no jurisdiction to entertain an application for review of a decision of the delegate of 28 March 2003. The Tribunal's reasons for so concluding was that the matter had already been considered by way of review by the Tribunal on an earlier occasion, which affirmed a decision refusing to grant the applicants protection visas (decision handed down on 1 October 2003 and considered in SZBTB v Minister for Immigration [2005] FMCA 1504, SZBTB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1924, and SZBTB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2006] HCATrans 486). 2 It is not apparent to me that the Federal Magistrate erred in reaching the conclusion he did. Leave to appeal is probably necessary. I would refuse leave if leave be necessary because the appeal would be futile. I otherwise dismiss the appeal. I order that the applicant pay the Minister's costs. I order that the name of the first respondent be varied to read, "The Minister for Immigration and Citizenship". I order that the costs be fixed in the sum of $1000. I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Moore.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate