Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Gurtler v Finance Now Pty Limited (ACN 102 197 973) [2007] FCA 477 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – orders made for production of categories of documents subject to any claim of legal professional privilege – legal professional privilege claimed – litigation funding agreement – communications between litigation funder and legal adviser – privilege challenged on basis of litigation funder's actions PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – issue waiver – reason for joining party – applicant not put in issue the contents of any communications made in the lawyer-client relationship – no inconsistency with the maintenance of the privilege PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – disclosure waiver – disclosed fact of giving instruction to join a third party to proceedings – did not disclose the contents of the instructions– no inconsistency with maintenance of privilege PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – litigation funder alleged to be pursuing its own interests – while applicant has used litigation funder as agent in the proceedings he still remained the client of the legal representatives for the purposes of conduct of the litigation – funding agreement gave rise to common and several interests – common interest privilege – no prima facie or reasonably arguable case of pursuit of litigation funder's own and paramount purposes PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – fraud/improper purpose exception – allegation of fraud against the respondent – not shown to be lacking any foundation – communication not made for an improper purpose Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 183 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth)
Campbells Cash and Carry Pty Ltd v Fostif Pty Ltd (2006) 229 ALR 58 distinguished Fostif Pty Ltd v Campbells Cash & Carry Pty Ltd (2005) 63 NSWLR 203 cited Adelaide Steamship Co Ltd v Spalvins (1998) 81 FCR 360 followed Commissioner of Taxation v Rio Tinto Ltd (2006) 229 ALR 304 followed DSE (Holdings) Pty Ltd v Intertan Inc (2003) 127 FCR 499 cited Telstra Corp Ltd v BT Australasia Pty Ltd (1998) 85 FCR 152 cited Mann v Carnell (1999) 201 CLR 1 followed Southern Equities Corporation Ltd (in liq) v Arthur Anderson & Co (1997) 70 SASR 166 cited Farrow Mortgage Services Pty Ltd (in liq) v Webb (1996) 39 NSWLR 601 cited Patrick v Capital Finance Corporation (Australasia) Pty Ltd (2004) 211 ALR 272 cited Ampolex Ltd v Perpetual Trustee Co (Canberra) Ltd (1995) 37 NSWLR 405 cited GEC Marconi Systems Pty Ltd v BHP Information Technology Pty Ltd (2003) 128 FCR 1 cited Commissioner of Australian Federal Police v Propend Finance Pty Ltd (1997) 188 CLR 501 cited Commissioner of Australian Federal Police v Propend Finance Pty Ltd (1997) 188 CLR 501 cited Attorney-General (NT) v Kearney (1985) 158 CLR 500 cited AWB Ltd v Cole (No 5) [2006] FCA 1234 cited Yunghanns v Elfic Pty Ltd (2000) 1 VR 92 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate