Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Garrett v Rann [2007] FCA 528
ANDREW MORTON GARRETT v THE HONOURABLE MICHAEL RANN MP, PREMIER OF THE STATE OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA, THE HONOURABLE PAUL HOLLOWAY MP, MINISTER FOR PLANNING OF THE STATE OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA, CITY OF MITCHAM, COUNCILLORS OF THE CITY OF MITCHAM, JUSTICE BRUCE DE BELLE, CONSERVATION COUNCIL OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA, JASMINE ROSE, HILLS FACE NETWORK AND MARCUS BERESFORD SAD 15 OF 2007
MANSFIELD J
13 APRIL 2007
ADELAIDE IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY SAD 15 OF 2007
BETWEEN: ANDREW MORTON GARRETT
Applicant
AND: THE HONOURABLE MICHAEL RANN MP, PREMIER OF THE STATE OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA
First Respondent
THE HONOURABLE PAUL HOLLOWAY MP, MINISTER FOR PLANNING OF THE STATE OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA
Second Respondent
CITY OF MITCHAM
Third Respondent
COUNCILLORS OF THE CITY OF MITCHAM
Fourth Respondent
JUSTICE BRUCE DE BELLE
Fifth Respondent
CONSERVATION COUNCIL OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA
Sixth Respondent
JASMINE ROSE
Seventh Respondent
HILLS FACE NETWORK
Eighth Respondent
MARCUS BERESFORD
Ninth Respondent
JUDGE: MANSFIELD J
DATE OF ORDER: 13 APRIL 2007
WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay to the first to fifth respondents their costs of the application. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY SAD 15 OF 2007
BETWEEN: ANDREW MORTON GARRETT
Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate