Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Garrett v Bransbury [2007] FCA 529
ANDREW MORTON GARRETT v EDIE BRANSBURY THE REGISTRAR OF THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA, JUSTICE TIMOTHY ANDERSON OF THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA AND THE HONOURABLE MICHAEL RANN MP PREMIER OF THE STATE OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA SAD 21 OF 2007
MANSFIELD J
13 APRIL 2007
ADELAIDE IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY SAD 21 OF 2007
BETWEEN: ANDREW MORTON GARRETT
Applicant
AND: EDIE BRANSBURY THE REGISTRAR OF THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA
First Respondent
JUSTICE TIMOTHY ANDERSON OF THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA
Second Respondent
THE HONOURABLE MICHAEL RANN MP PREMIER OF THE STATE OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA
Third Respondent
JUDGE: MANSFIELD J
DATE OF ORDER: 13 APRIL 2007
WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application be dismissed. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY SAD 21 OF 2007
BETWEEN: ANDREW MORTON GARRETT
Applicant
AND: EDIE BRANSBURY THE REGISTRAR OF THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA
First Respondent
JUSTICE TIMOTHY ANDERSON OF THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA
Second Respondent
THE HONOURABLE MICHAEL RANN MP PREMIER OF THE STATE OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA
Third Respondent
JUDGE: MANSFIELD J
DATE: 13 APRIL 2007
PLACE: ADELAIDE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 This application was issued on 3 February 2007. It was not supported by any affidavit or statement of claim. Subsequently, on 21 February 2007, the applicant filed a lengthy affidavit. I directed that neither of those documents be served pending my further consideration of them. 2 On 21 February 2007, I raised with the applicant some concerns about the competence of the proceeding. I gave him leave to file such amended application as he may be advised, together with any further affidavit upon which he relied and a brief outline of his contentions as to why the Court has jurisdiction to issue the proposed orders, all by 21 March 2007. He has not filed any further documents. 3 For the reasons which appear, of my own motion, I dismiss the application.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate