Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Vishnumolakala v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (No 2) [2007] FCA 594 RAVI KUMAR VISHNUMOLAKALA v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS No NSD 1983 of 2006
FINN J
27 APRIL 2007
ADELAIDE (HEARD IN SYDNEY) IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1983 OF 2006
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: RAVI KUMAR VISHNUMOLAKALA
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
Respondent
JUDGE: FINN J DATE OF ORDER: 27 APRIL 2007
WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE (heard in sydney)
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed with costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1983 OF 2006
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: RAVI KUMAR VISHNUMOLAKALA
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
Respondent
JUDGE: FINN J
DATE: 27 april 2007
PLACE: ADELAIDE (HEARD IN SYDNEY)
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 This appeal from a decision of a Federal Magistrate refusing relief by way of constitutional writs against a decision of the respondent Minister's delegate has taken an unusual course. Of the seven grounds contained in the original application all but one have been abandoned. Leave was sought to raise four new grounds. In turn two of these were abandoned. I refused leave in the case of another at an earlier interlocutory hearing and indicated I would consider the remaining application for leave at this hearing. The ground sought to be raised was not in issue before the Federal Magistrate. I will refer to these two live grounds separately below.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate