Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZHLU v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 607 SZHLU v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL NSD 1903 OF 2006
SIOPIS J
16 FEBRUARY 2007
SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1903 OF 2006
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZHLU
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: SIOPIS J DATE OF ORDER: 16 FEBRUARY 2007
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The name of the first respondent is amended to "Minister for Immigration and Citizenship". 2. The appeal is dismissed. 3. The appellant shall pay the first respondent's costs, fixed in the sum of $2,600. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1903 OF 2006
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZHLU
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: SIOPIS J
DATE: 16 FEBRUARY 2007
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 This is an appeal from the orders and judgment of Federal Magistrate Lindsay dated 11 September 2006. 2 When the matter was called on for hearing today the appellant was not present in Court. I stood the matter down. It is now almost 10.40 am. The Court officer has called this matter outside the Court on two separate occasions. On the first occasion, the Court officer used the appellant's pseudonym. On the second occasion, the Court officer used the appellant's real name. There was no response to the call by the Court officer. 3 I have before me two letters. One letter is written by a District Registrar of the Federal Court, dated 13 December 2006, addressed to each of the parties, advising that the appeal would be heard today at 10.15 am. There is also a letter before me dated 23 January 2006, which was written by the representative of the first respondent to the appellant, which advises the appellant that the matter would be listed today at 10.15 am, and which contains the following sentence: If you do not attend on this occasion [the first respondent] will seek orders from the Court that your matter be dismissed and that you pay the Minister's legal costs of the proceedings. 4 I am satisfied that the appellant was notified of the hearing today. He has not appeared. 5 I have power under s 25(2B)(bb)(ii) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) to dismiss the appeal in those circumstances. I dismiss the appeal. I certify that the preceding five (5) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Siopis.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate