Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Rhee v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 620 MAN GWON RHEE v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP AND MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL NSD 197 OF 2007
MOORE J
1 MAY 2007
SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 197 OF 2007
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: MAN GWON RHEE
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: MOORE J DATE OF ORDER: 1 MAY 2007
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application for an extension of time be dismissed pursuant to s 25(2B)(bb)(ii) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth). 2. The applicant pay the first respondent's costs fixed in the sum of $1000.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 197 OF 2007
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: MAN GWON RHEE
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: MOORE J
DATE: 1 MAY 2007
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 This is an application for an extension of time in which to appeal against a judgment of a Federal Magistrate of 16 January 2007: see Rhee v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2007] FMCA 23. The matter was listed for hearing today. The applicant was notified of the time and date of the hearing by a letter from the Court dated 29 March 2007 addressed to the address for service. There has been no appearance. A further letter dated 26 April 2007 was sent by the solicitors appearing for the first respondent by courier to the same address, which again identified the time and date for hearing. 2 I have been asked to dismiss the application for non appearance. I propose to do so. I order that the application be dismissed and that the applicant pay the first respondent's costs. I further order that those costs be fixed in the sum of $1,000. I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Moore.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate