Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
TS & B Retail Systems Pty Ltd v 3Fold Resources Pty Ltd (No 4) [2007] FCA 635
COSTS – solicitor and client costs – whether warranted – Bullock order – Sanderson order – when applicable PRACTICE & PROCEDURE – interest on judgment – rate to be applied – when State penalty interest rate to be applied – period of interest – relevance of delay
Penalty Interest Rates Act 1983 (Vic) Besterman v British Motor Cab Co Ltd [1914] 3 KB 181 Bullock v London General Omnibus Company [1907] 1 KB 264 Cirillo v Consolidated Press Property Ltd (No 2) [2007] FCA 179 Clarke v Foodland Stores Pty Ltd [1993] 2 VR 382 ECML Pty Ltd v Essanda Finance Corp Ltd [1999] FCA 978 GEC Marconi Systems Pty Ltd v BHP Information Technology Pty Ltd (2003) 201 ALR 55 Gould v Vaggelas (1984) 157 CLR 215 Hamod v New South Wales (2002) 188 ALR 659 Harbutt's Plasticine Ltd v Wayne Tank and Pump Co Ltd [1970] 1 QB 447 Johnson's Tyne Foundry Pty Ltd v Maffra Shire Council (1948) 77 CLR 544 Namol Pty Ltd v AW Balderstone Pty Ltd (No 2) (1993) 47 FCR 388 Marsh v Ruby [1975] VR 191 Riches v Westminster Bank Limited [1947] AC 390 Sanderson v Blyth Theatre Company [1903] 2 KB 533 Walker v Citigroup Global Markets Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 1866 TS & B RETAIL SYSTEMS PTY LTD v 3FOLD RESOURCES PTY LTD, PETER VANDERZAAG, FRANCIS D'MELLO and GARY WILLIAM SMITH VID 147 of 2003
FINKELSTEIN J
4 MAY 2007
MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VID 147of 2003
BETWEEN: TS & B RETAIL SYSTEMS PTY LTD
Applicant
AND: 3FOLD RESOURCES PTY LTD,
PETER VANDERZAAG,
FRANCIS D'MELLO
and GARY WILLIAM SMITH
Respondents
JUDGE: FINKELSTEIN J DATE OF ORDER: 4 MAY 2007
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT DECLARES: 1. That the first respondent has: (a) infringed the applicant's copyright subsisting in the drawings listed by number in Annexure A (the Drawings) and in the five tables of data listed by name in Annexure B (the Data) ; (b) breached the applicant's confidence in the information contained in that part of the five tables of data listed in Annexure B comprising kit numbers, item numbers, sequence numbers, quantities of parts in a unit and references to drawings of Trollope Silverwood & Beck Pty Ltd (the Confidential Data). 1. That the second and third respondents (and each of them) have: (a) authorised and procured the infringement by the first respondent of the applicant's copyright subsisting in the Drawings and the Data; (b) breached the applicant's confidence in the information contained in the Confidential Data.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate