Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZHCH v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2007] FCA 679 SZHCH v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP AND REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL NSD 267 OF 2007
EDMONDS J
10 MAY 2007
SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 267 OF 2007
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZHCH
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: EDMONDS J DATE OF ORDER: 10 MAY 2007
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The appellant pay the first respondent's costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 267 OF 2007
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZHCH
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: EDMONDS J
DATE: 10 MAY 2007
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Introduction 1 This is an appeal from a judgment of the Federal Magistrates Court (Raphael FM) dismissing an application for review of a decision of the second respondent ('the Tribunal') affirming a decision of a delegate of the first respondent ('the Minister') refusing an application for a protection visa (class XA).
Background 2 The appellant is a citizen of Bangladesh. The appellant arrived in Australia on 4 November 2004 and on 14 December 2004 he lodged an application for a protection visa (class XA). After the Minister's delegate refused the protection visa application on 18 February 2005, the appellant applied on 21 March 2005 to the Tribunal for a review of that decision. 3 Before the Tribunal, the appellant claimed to have well-founded fear of persecution for his political opinion. He claimed to have been a district organising secretary of the youth league of the Bangladesh Awami League ('the AL'). He claimed to have joined the AL in 1992. In 2001 the AL lost the general election. The appellant claimed he was persecuted by the Bangladesh Nationalist Party ('the BNP') and that at one stage he had been ambushed, attacked and tortured. The appellant claimed that a case was filed against him for a murder charge and that police were still looking for him. He claimed that in March 2002 BNP activists attacked him resulting in hospitalisation and he realised his life was in danger. On 15 May 2003 the appellant departed Bangladesh for the United Arab Emirates to work as a cook. He stayed there until November 2004 when he left for Australia.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate