Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZGCF v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2007] FCA 680 SZGCF AND SZGCG v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS AND REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL NSD 26 OF 2007
EDMONDS J
10 MAY 2007
SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 26 OF 2007
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZGCF
First Appellant
SZGCG
Second Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: EDMONDS J DATE OF ORDER: 10 MAY 2007
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The appellant pay the first respondent's costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 26 OF 2007
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZGCF
First Appellant
SZGCG
Second Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: EDMONDS J
DATE: 10 MAY 2007
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Introduction 1 This is an appeal from a judgment of the Federal Magistrates Court (Burnett FM) dismissing an application for review of a decision of the second respondent ('the Tribunal') affirming a decision of a delegate of the first respondent ('the Minister') refusing an application for protection visas.
Background 2 The appellants are husband and wife, and along with their daughter, are citizens of Bangladesh. They departed Bangladesh in March 2004 and travelled to New Zealand. They departed New Zealand in August 2004 for Australia, arriving on 15 August 2004. On 15 September 2004 they lodged an application for protection visas (class XA) claiming to fear persecution by reason of the husband's political opinion. A delegate of the Minister refused to grant them protection visas and they applied to the Tribunal for review of that decision.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate