Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Biodiesel Producers Limited (ACN 099 165 876) v Stewart [2007] FCA 722
CORPORATIONS LAW – applicant a start up company with first respondent as company secretary and second respondent effectively as company managing director – incorporated for the purpose of constructing and running a biodiesel plant – sources of funding to be a Commonwealth Government grant and private investor ANZ Infrastructure Services Limited – site for the plant purchased – delays in securing development approval – delays in securing funding – delays in securing plant – dispute between Board members and first and second respondents – second respondent settled with the applicant and took no part in the litigation. CORPORATIONS LAW – purported issue of performance shares to respondents by directors under a 'circular resolution' – performance shares would convert into B Class shares upon the achievement of certain milestones. CORPORATIONS LAW – breach of fiduciary duty – failure on part of first respondent to fully inform the board of directly relevant legal advice prior to signing of the circular resolution – first respondent owed a statutory duty as an officer of the applicant ss 180(1), 181(1) and 182(1) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and common law and fiduciary duties – Board would not have signed the circular resolution if it had known of the advice – circular resolution rescinded. CORPORATIONS LAW – issue of performance shares which converted into B Class shares created a new class of shares – variation of class rights s 246C(5) Corporations Act – no shareholders' consent – not done in conformity with s 246B(1) Corporations Act – not done in conformity with company constitution. CORPORATIONS LAW – failure to obtain shareholders' consent – whether a procedural irregularity amenable to validation under ss 1322 or 254E Corporations Act – no application made under either section – no substantial injustice. CONTRACT – circular resolution – on proper construction performance shares issued at the time of the making of the circular resolution – performance shares were to convert in tranches at the achievement of the set milestones – milestones would be required to be achieved within a reasonable time – shares would not convert if the applicant achieved the milestones in the future. CONTRACT – Executive Service Agreement for services of the first respondent – not executed under authority of a Board resolution – conditions precedent to the agreement were not met – agreement never took effect – whether clause that applicant pay the entirety of the remuneration package for the remainder of the term of the agreement amounted to a penalty.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate