Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZBLY v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 765 MIGRATION – leave to rely upon ground of appeal abandoned in the Court below – reasonable apprehension of bias where reconstituted Tribunal has previously made adverse credibility findings – procedural unfairness – jurisdictional error. Held: Appeal upheld Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 414, 415, 424A(1) Applicant NAFF of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2004) 221 CLR 1, cited Australian National Industries Ltd v Spedley Securities Ltd (in liq) (1992) 26 NSWLR 411, referred to Bilgin v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1997) 149 ALR 281, distinguished Coulton v Holcombe (1986) 162 CLR 1, referred to Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (2000) 205 CLR 337, referred to Ex parte Schofield; Re Austin (1953) 53 SR (NSW) 163, referred to Galea v Galea (1990) 19 NSWLR 263, adopted Gomez v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2002) 190 ALR 543, referred to Grassy v The Queen (1989) 168 CLR 1, referred to Hosler v Maughan (1989) 40 A Crim R 281, referred to J.R.L.; Ex parte C.J.L (1986) 161 CLR 342, followed Kanda v Government of Malaya [1962] AC 322, followed Khadem v Barbour (1995) 38 ALD 299, referred to Livesey v New South Wales Bar Association (1983) 151 CLR 288, referred to Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Bhardwaj (2002) 209 CLR 597, considered Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu (1999) 197 CLR 611, cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Jia (2001) 178 ALR 421, referred to Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v SZGMF [2006] FCAFC 138, referred to NAHD of 2001 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2005) 214 ALR 264, followed NAJT v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2005) 147 FCR 51, considered O'Brien v Komesaroff (1982) 150 CLR 310, referred to Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth (2003) 211 CLR 476, referred to R v Watson; Ex parte Armstrong (1976) 136 CLR 248, followed Re Finance Sector Union of Australia; Ex parte Illaton Pty Ltd (1992) 6 ALJR 583, referred to Re Polites: Ex parte Hoyts Corporation Pty Ltd (No 2) (1991) 173 CLR 78, referred to Re Refugee Tribunal; Ex parte H (2001) 179 ALR 425, followed SAAP v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous affairs (2005) 79 ALJR 1009, considered SZCIJ v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCAFC 62, considered SZEPN v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 886, cited SZFIR v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 424, referred VAAC v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 129 FCR 168, referred to Vakauta v Kelly (1989) 167 CLR 568, considered VUAX v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 158, considered Vyvyan v Vyvyan (1861) 54 ER 813, referred to White v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2000) 96 FCR 511, adopted Wimalaratne v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1737, considered. SZBLY v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP AND REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL NSD 451 OF 2007
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate