Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZJJL v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 783 SZJJL v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP AND REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL NSD 337 OF 2007
CONTI J
24 MAY 2007
SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 337 OF 2007
BETWEEN: SZJJL
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: CONTI J DATE OF ORDER: 24 MAY 2007
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The appellant pay the first respondent's costs of the appeal. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 337 OF 2007
BETWEEN: SZJJL
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: CONTI J
DATE: 24 MAY 2007
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Introduction 1 This is an appeal against the judgment and orders of Federal Magistrate Scarlett delivered on 16 February 2007, whereby his Honour dismissed the appellant's application for judicial review of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal ('the Tribunal') made on 2 August 2006 and handed down on 22 August 2006. The Tribunal had earlier affirmed the decision of a delegate of the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (as the Minister was then designated), made on 19 May 2006, not to grant the applicant a protection visa. 2 The appellant is a citizen of India. He arrived in Australia on 13 March 2006 and applied to the Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs for a protection (Class XA) visa on 11 April 2006.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate