Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Rambaldi v Thake [2007] FCA 847 GESS MICHAEL RAMBALDI v GEOFFREY FRANCIS THAKE VID 204 OF 2007
GORDON J
23 APRIL 2007
MELBOURNE IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VID 204 OF 2007
BETWEEN: GESS MICHAEL RAMBALDI
Applicant
AND: GEOFFREY FRANCIS THAKE
Respondent
JUDGE: GORDON J DATE OF ORDER: 23 APRIL 2007
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Pursuant to section 146 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ("the Act"), the applicant have leave to distribute an interim dividend amongst the creditors who have proved their debts in the bankrupt estate of Geoffrey Francis Thake ("the bankrupt"), namely RACV Finance - $11,341.45, and Credit Corp Services Proprietary Limited - $6070.14, in accordance with Part VI, Division 5 of the Act, as if the bankrupt had filed a statement of affairs and those creditors had been stated to be creditors in it. 2. The applicant shall not be required to publish any further advertisement giving notice of intention to declare the dividend in the bankrupt estate of the bankrupt referred to in paragraph (1) hereof. 3. The costs of and incidental to this application be made out of the estate of the bankrupt. 4. The application filed 14 March 2007 be adjourned to 9.30 am on 29 June 2007 to enable the Deputy Commissioner of Taxation to determine whether he or she is a creditor of the bankrupt estate of the bankrupt. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VID 204 OF 2007
BETWEEN: GESS MICHAEL RAMBALDI
Applicant
AND: GEOFFREY FRANCIS THAKE
Respondent
JUDGE: GORDON J
DATE: 23 APRIL 2007
PLACE: MELBOURNE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 This is an application by Gess Michael Rambaldi ('the trustee'), the trustee of the bankrupt estate of Geoffrey Francis Thake ('the bankrupt'), pursuant to section 146 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth). Section 146 provides: Where a bankrupt has failed to file a statement of his or her affairs, as required by this Act, the court may, on the application of the trustee, upon such terms as it thinks fit, order that distribution of dividends amongst the creditors who have proved their debts shall proceed in accordance with this division as if the bankrupt had filed a statement of his or her affairs and those creditors had been stated to be creditors in it. 2 The trustee, Mr Rambaldi, contended that it would be appropriate to proceed with an interim dividend, notwithstanding that the bankrupt had failed to file a statement of affairs. The application was supported by an affidavit sworn by the trustee on 6 March 2007. The affidavit evidence was not contradicted by the bankrupt.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate