Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Applicant S1983 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 854 MIGRATION – appellant claimed in his protection visa application to fear persecution because he was low caste – discussion at Tribunal hearing as to whether appellant claimed persecution on basis of being a Sindhi or a Dalit (low caste) – whether Tribunal misunderstood distinction between being a Sindhi and a Dalit – whether Tribunal considered appellant's claim to fear persecution on basis of being a Dalit – whether further evidence permitted to be received on appeal regarding the meaning of the terms Sindhi and Dalit – Held: further evidence received on appeal – Tribunal failed to address the claim advanced by the appellant
Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 144 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 27 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 91(R) Federal Court Rules O 52 r 36
Camden v Commissioners of Inland Revenue [1914] 1 KB 641 cited CDJ v VAJ (1998) 197 CLR 172 cited Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2003) 197 ALR 389 cited Fodare Pty Limited v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2000] FCA 1721 cited MZWVH v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCA 1016 cited State of Queensland v JL Holdings Pty Ltd (1997) 189 CLR 146 cited APPLICANT S1983 OF 2003 v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP AND REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL NSD 144 OF 2007
BRANSON J
8 JUNE 2007
SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 144 OF 2007
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: APPLICANT S1983 OF 2003
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: BRANSON J DATE OF ORDER: 8 JUNE 2007
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate