FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA SZAKL v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 886 SZAKL v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP AND REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL NSD 779 OF 2007 MOORE J 8 JUNE 2007 SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 779 OF 2007 BETWEEN: SZAKL Applicant AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP First Respondent REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL Second Respondent JUDGE: MOORE J DATE OF ORDER: 8 JUNE 2007 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the first respondent's costs fixed in the sum of $800. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 779 OF 2007 BETWEEN: SZAKL Applicant AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP First Respondent REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL Second Respondent JUDGE: MOORE J DATE: 8 JUNE 2007 PLACE: SYDNEY REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 This is an application for leave to appeal against a judgment of a Federal Magistrate of 16 April 2007 dismissing as an abuse of process an application for judicial review (see: SZAKL v Minister for Immigration [2007] FMCA 622). The applicant sought judicial review of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal of 13 February 2007 in which the Tribunal indicated it did not have jurisdiction to entertain another application for review of a decision of the delegate of the Minister refusing the applicant a protection visa. 2 The conclusion of the Federal Magistrate appears to me to be correct and there are no prospects of the applicant succeeding in any appeal if leave were given. Accordingly I dismiss the application for leave to appeal and order the applicant to pay the Minister's costs. I note that this application for leave to appeal is made against an extensive background of litigation both in this Court, the Federal Magistrates Court and the High Court (see: SZAKL v Minister for Immigration [2004] FMCA 170; SZAKL v Minister for Immigration [2004] FCA 1257; SZAKL v Minister for Immigration [2005] HCATrans 495; SZAKL v Minister for Immigration [2005] FMCA 1965; SZAKL v Minister for Immigration [2006] FCA 567; SZAKL v Minister for Immigration [2006] HCATrans 651). I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Moore. Associate: Dated: 26 June 2007 The Applicant appeared in person Solicitor for the First Respondent: Blake Dawson Waldron Date of Hearing: 8 June 2007 Date of Judgment: 8 June 2007