Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Penhall-Jones v State of NSW [2007] FCA 925
APPEAL – principles to be applied – necessity to show error
NATURAL JUSTICE – use of strong language in dealing with claims – not evidence of apparent bias
STANDARD OF PROOF – reference to Briginshaw standard – no third or intermediate standard of proof – requirement of cogent proof for satisfaction or reasonable satisfaction having regard to the gravity of an issue
VICTIMISATION – on the ground of – substantial or operative reason
WORDS AND PHRASES – on the ground of
Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1994 (Cth) s 5 Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) s 10, s 42 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 140 Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Act 1986 (Cth) s 3, s 46P(1), s 46PO, s 46PH Protected Disclosures Act 1994 (NSW) s 8(1)(c)(i), s 14, s 16 Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) s 8, s 94
Bailey v Australian National University(1995) EOC 92-744 Branir Pty Ltd v Owston Nominees (No 2) Pty Ltd (2001) 117 FCR 424 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 Coal and Allied Operations Pty Limited v Australian Industrial Relations Commission (2000) 203 CLR 194 Commonwealth of Australia v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (1993) 46 FCR 191 Commonwealth v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (1997) 77 FCR 371 Commonwealth of Australia v Humphries (1998) 86 FCR 324 Damiano v Wilkinson [2004] FMCA 891 Forbes v Australian Federal Police (Commonwealth of Australia) [2004] FCAFC 95 Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118 General Motors-Holden's Pty Ltd v Bowling (1976) 51 ALJR 235 Helton v Allen (1940) 63 CLR 691 Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission v Mount Isa Mines Ltd (1993) 46 FCR 301 Mikasa (NSW) Pty Limited v Festival Stores (1972) 127 CLR 617 Morrison-Liddy v Director, Department of Technical & Further Education (1989) EOC 92-246 Neat Holdings Pty Ltd v Karajan Holdings Pty Ltd (1992) 67 ALJR 170 O'Callaghan v Loder [1983] 3 NSWLR 89 O'Connor v Ross (No 1) [2002] FMCA 210 Obieta v New South Wales Department of Education and Training [2007] FCA 86 Penhall-Jones v Stiftung Ausbildungsfonds Jung'she Psychologie [2006] HCATrans 100 Poulet Frais Pty Ltd v The Silver Fox Company Pty Ltd (2005) 220 ALR 211 Rejfek v McElroy (1965) 112 CLR 517 Ross v Ross [1930] AC 1 Warren v Coombes (1979) 142 CLR 531 Waterhouse v Bell (1991) 25 NSWLR 99
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate