Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Clough Engineering Ltd v Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd [No 2] [2007] FCA 927
INJUNCTION – application to discharge interim interlocutory injunction – whether respondent Banks ought be enjoined from paying under performance guarantees by way of ancillary relief to preserve status quo where principal already enjoined from taking further steps to demand or obtain payment under performance guarantees issued by Banks. Trade Practices Act 1976 (Cth), ss 6(2), 80, 51AA Anaconda Operations Pty Ltd v Fluor Daniel Pty Ltd [1999] VSCA 214 referred to Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v CG Berbatis Holdings Pty Ltd (2003) 197 ALR 153 referred to Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v CG Berbatis Holdings Pty Ltd (No 2) (2000) 96 FCR 491 referred to Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Samton Holdings Pty Ltd (2002) 117 FCR 301 cited Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Lenah Game Meats Pty Ltd (2001) 76 ALJR 1 referred to Australasian Conference Association Ltd v Mainline Constructions Pty Ltd (in liq) (1978) 141 CLR 335 cited Bachmann Pty Ltd v BHP Power New Zealand Ltd [1999] 1 VR 420 considered Bolivinter Oil SA v Chase Manhattan Bank NA [1984] 1 Lloyd's Rep 251 cited Boral Formwork v Action Makers (2003) ATPR 41-953 referred to Cargill International SA v Bangladesh Sugar & Food Corporation [1996] 2 Lloyd's LR 524 cited Clough Engineering Ltd v Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd [2007] FCA 881 referred to Deutsche Ruckversicherung AG v Wallbrook Insurance Co Ltd [1996] 1 WLR 1017 cited Fletcher Construction Australia Limited v Varnsdorf Pty Ltd Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [1998] 3 VR 812 referred to Hortico (Australia) Pty Ltd v Energy Equipment Co (Australia) Pty Ltd (1985) 1 NSWLR 545 referred to Hughes Bros Pty Ltd v Telede Pty Ltd (1989) 7 BCL 210 referred to ICI Australia Operations Pty Ltd v Trade Practices Commission (1992) 38 FCR 248 referred to Ideas Plus Investments Ltd v National Australia Bank Ltd (2006) 32 WAR 467 considered Legione v Hateley (1983) 152 CLR 406 cited Logue v Shoalhaven Shire Council [1979] 1 NSWLR 537 cited Mitsui Kensetsu Corporation Australia Pty Ltd v State of South Australia(unreported Qld Supreme Court, 9 August 1990 referred to Olex Focas Pty Ltd v Skodaexport Co Ltd [1998] 3 VR 380 at 400 applied Pierce Bell Sales Pty Ltd v Frazer (1973) 130 CLR 575 cited Reed Construction Services Pty Ltd v Kheng Seng (Australia) Pty Ltd (1999) 15 BCL 158 applied Stern v McArthur (1988) 165 CLR 489 referred to Tanwar Enterprises Pty Ltd v Cauchi (2003) 217 CLR 315 referred to Wood Hall Ltd v The Pipeline Authority (1979) 141 CLR 443 considered World Series Cricket Pty Ltd v Parish (1977) 16 ALR 181 referred to CLOUGH ENGINEERING LIMITED v OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LIMITED, COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA, HSBC BANK AUSTRALIA LIMITED AND BNP PARIBAS WAD117 OF 2007
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate