Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Knight [2007] FCA 1011 TRADE PRACTICES – Competition Code of South Australia – Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) – whether penalty agreed by parties appropriate – where admission to contravention of ss 45(2)(a)(ii) and 45(2)(b)(ii) and to attempted contravention of s 45(2)(a)(ii) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Competition Policy Reform (South Australia) Act 1996 (SA) Trade Practices Commission v TNT Australia Pty Ltd (1995) ATPR 41-375 considered >NW Frozen Foods Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (1996) 71 FCR 285 considered Trade Practices Commission v Allied Mills Industries Pty Ltd (No 4) (1981) 37 ALR 256 discussed Minister for Industry, Tourism and Resources v Mobil Oil Australia Pty Ltd (2004) ATPR 41-993 cited Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Real Estate Institute of Western Australia Inc (1999) 161 ALR 79 discussed Trade Practices Commission v Santos Limited (1993) ATPR 41-221 cited Tobacco Institute of Australia Limited v Australian Federation of Consumer Organisations Inc (No 2) (1993) 41 FCR 89 cited RAIA Insurance Brokers Limited v FAI General Insurance Co Limited (1993) 41 FCR 164 cited Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Target (2001) ATPR 41-840 cited Ainsworth and Anor v Criminal Justice Commission (1992) 175 CLR 564 cited Forster v Jododex Aust Pty Limited (1972) 127 CLR 421 cited Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Goldy Motors Pty Ltd (2001) ATPR 41-801 cited Rural Press Limited v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2003) 216 CLR 53 cited Trade Practices Commission v CSR Limited (1991) ATPR 41-076 considered Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v J McPhee & Son (Australia) Pty Ltd (1998) ATPR 41-628 cited Trade Practices Commission v Stihl Chain Saws (Aust) Pty Ltd (1978) ATPR 40-091 cited Trade Practices Commission v Mobil Oil Australia Ltd (1984) 4 FCR 296 cited Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Leahy Petroleum Pty Ltd (No 3) (2005) 215 ALR 301 considered AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v JOHN LINCOLN KNIGHT AND IAIN KENNETH ROSS SAD 22 OF 2007
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate