Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Fisher v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 1052
MIGRATION – whether an extension of time within which to seek leave to appeal should be granted to the applicant – no jurisdictional error of the Tribunal – application not expedient in the interests of justice – Held: application dismissed
Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 24(1A) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 477A Federal Court Rules O 52 r 10(2A), O 52 r 36 Fisher v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 951 Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs v Katisat [2005] FCA 1908 Sales v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 1807 RICARDO FISHER v MINISTER OF IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP AND ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL NSD 903 OF 2007
BRANSON J
3 JULY 2007
SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 903 OF 2007
BETWEEN: RICARDO FISHER
Applicant
AND: MINISTER OF IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: BRANSON J
DATE OF ORDER: 3 JULY 2007
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application for an extension of time within which to apply for leave to appeal from the interlocutory judgement pronounced by Stone J on 30 April 2007 be dismissed. 2. The application for leave to appeal from the interlocutory judgement pronounced by Stone J on 30 April 2007 be dismissed as incompetent. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 903 OF 2007
BETWEEN: RICARDO FISHER
Applicant
AND: MINISTER OF IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate