Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Renault SAS v Nissan Motor Car Carrier Co Ltd [2007] FCA 1068 RENAULT SAS AND VEHICLE DISTRIBUTORS AUSTRALIA PTY LTD v NISSAN MOTOR CAR CARRIER CO LTD, HöEGH FLEET SERVICES AS, WOOD STREET LEASING LTD AND LEIF HöEGH & CO SHIPPING AS NSD 2269 OF 2006
ALLSOP J
17 JULY 2007
SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 2269 OF 2006
BETWEEN: RENAULT SAS
First Plaintiff
VEHICLE DISTRIBUTORS AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
Second Plaintiff
AND: NISSAN MOTOR CAR CARRIER CO LTD
First Defendant
HöEGH FLEET SERVICES AS
Second Defendant
WOOD STREET LEASING LTD
Third Defendant
LEIF HöEGH & CO SHIPPING AS
Fourth Defendant
JUDGE: ALLSOP J DATE OF ORDER: 17 JULY 2007
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The first and second plaintiffs have leave to amend the statement of claim and application to add Leif Höegh & Co Shipping AS as fourth defendant and to file the amended statement of claim and application. 2. The first and second plaintiffs pay the costs, if any, thrown away by reason of the amendment. 3. Pursuant to Order 8 Rule 2 the first and second plaintiffs have leave to serve, by a lawyer in Norway, the amended statement of claim, amended application, these orders and the reasons for judgment of Allsop J of 17 July 2007 on the fourth defendant in Norway. 4. The Court directs that the first and second plaintiffs serve with the amended statement of claim, amended application and these short minutes of order certified translations of those documents in the Norwegian language. 5. The proceedings are listed for further directions at 9:30 am on 31 August 2007 for further directions. 6. The Court notes that the agreement of the plaintiffs and first to third defendants that the proceedings are to proceed to mediation on a date to be allocated in September 2007. 7. The costs of the notice of motion dated 28 June 2007 are to be the plaintiffs' costs of the proceeding. 8. The parties have liberty to apply on 3 days' notice. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate