Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kowalski v MMAL Staff Superannuation Fund Pty Ltd ACN 064 829 616 [2007] FCA 1069
FEDERAL JURISDICTION – Trade Practices Act claim summarily dismissed – claim not colourable or trivial or insubstantial – jurisdiction over the remainder of the controversy PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – respondent filed Notice of Motion seeking orders that the originating process be set aside under O 9 r 7 of the Federal Court Rules on the basis of no jurisdiction – that the proceedings be dismissed as frivolous, vexatious or an abuse of process – that the applicant's proceedings be declared vexatious and an order be made under O 21 r 1 or r 2 – that the applicant provide security for costs – proceeding dismissed in part Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)ss 51AF, 52, 82, 87 Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth)Pt 2 Div 2 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 31A(2), 56 Federal Court Rules O 9 r 7, O 20 r 2, O 21 r 1, O 21 r 2, O 28 r 2 Kowalski v Mitsubishi Motors Australia Ltd (1998) 88 FCR 55 cited Kowalski v Mitsubishi Motors Australia Staff Superannuation Fund Pty Ltd [2002] FCA 1153 considered Kowalski v Mitsubishi Motors Australia Staff Superannuation Fund Pty Ltd [2003] FCAFC 18 considered Mitsubishi Motors Australia Ltd v Kowalski [2005] SASC 154 cited Nixon v Philip Morris (Australia) Ltd (1999) 95 FCR 453 cited Harris v Digital Pulse Pty Ltd (2003) 56 NSWLR 298cited Burgundy Royale Investments Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation (1987) 18 FCR 212 cited Concrete Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd v Nelson (1990) 169 CLR 594 cited State Superannuation Board v Trade Practices Commission (1982) 150 CLR 282cited Johnson Tiles Pty Ltd v Esso Australia Ltd (2000) ATPR 41-743 cited WG & B Manufacturing Pty Ltd v Tesla Farad Pty Ltd (1999) 48 IPR 111 cited Unilan Holdings Pty Ltd v Kerin (1992) 35 FCR 272 cited Fencott v Muller (1983) 152 CLR 570 cited Lindsey v Philip Morris Ltd [2004] FCA 797cited Bremer Vulkan Schiffbau Und Maschinenfabrik v South India Shipping Corp Ltd [1981] AC 909 cited Ramsey v Skyring (1999) 164 ALR 378 cited Freeman v National Australia Bank Ltd (2006) 230 ALR 213 cited Jones v Skyring (1992) 66 ALJR 810 cited Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Heinrich [2003] FCA 540 applied Equity Access Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation (1989) ATPR 40-972 cited Toohey's Ltd v Commissioner of Stamp Duties (1960) 60 SR (NSW) 539 cited Concrete Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd v Nelson (1990) 169 CLR 594 cited Hearn v O'Rourke (2003) 129 FCR 64 cited Village Building Co Ltd v Canberra International Airport Pty Ltd (2004) 210 ALR 114 cited Unilan Holdings Pty Ltd v Kerin (1993) 44 FCR 481 cited Allsop, "Federal Jurisdiction and the Jurisdiction of the Federal Court of Australia in 2002" (2002) 23 Aust Bar Rev 29
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate