Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Parker v Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission [2007] FCA 1161 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – consideration of the question of whether the Administrative Appeals Tribunal erred in law by finding that the respondent properly determined a degree of permanent impairment of nil in making a determination under s 24(5) of the Safety Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth) in respect of an injury suffered by the applicant giving rise to a permanent loss of sight in the right eye – consideration of whether reference to a pre‑existing condition properly resulted in a determination of no permanent impairment for the purposes of the Act – consideration of the provisions of a Guide to the Assessment of the Degree of Permanent Impairment as a subordinate instrument – consideration of the question to be addressed under s 24(5). Held Decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal set aside and consequential orders made. The Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975, s 44(1), s 44(4) Safety Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth), s 4(1), s 6A, s 14, s 24, s 28 Guide to the Assessment of the Degree of Permanent Impairment TNT Skypak International (Aust) Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1988) 19 ATR 1067 – quoted and applied Comcare v Etheridge 149 FCR 522 – quoted and applied Comcare v Houghton [2003] FCA 332 - quoted and applied Canute v Comcare [2006] HCA 47; 80 ALJR 1578 - quoted and applied RICHARD WILLIAM PARKER v MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION COMMISSION QUD328 OF 2006
GREENWOOD J
7 AUGUST 2007
BRISBANE IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY QUD328 OF 2006
ON APPEAL FROM THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL CONSTITUTED BY SENIOR MEMBER MCCABE
BETWEEN: RICHARD WILLIAM PARKER
Applicant
AND: MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION COMMISSION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate