Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZFTJ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 1193
MIGRATION – judicial review – whether Refugee Review Tribunal ('the Tribunal') considered appellant's claim of general discrimination against Buddhists in Bangladesh – whether claim was a "substantial, clearly articulated argument relying upon established facts" – where Tribunal's treatment of the claim was sufficient
NABE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2004) 144 FCR 1 applied Applicant NAKB of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 534 distinguished SZGOP v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 836 distinguished WAEE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2003) 75 ALD 630 applied SZFTJ v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP AND REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL NSD 620 OF 2007
MIDDLETON J
7 AUGUST 2007
SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 620 OF 2007
BETWEEN: SZFTJ
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: MIDDLETON J DATE OF ORDER: 7 AUGUST 2007
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed with costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 620 OF 2007
BETWEEN: SZFTJ
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: MIDDLETON J
DATE: 7 AUGUST 2007
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 This is an appeal from a decision of a federal magistrate dismissing an application for judicial review of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal ('the Tribunal') handed down on 26 September 2006. The Tribunal had affirmed a decision of a delegate of the first respondent to refuse to grant the appellant a protection visa.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate