Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Orrcon Operations Pty Ltd v Capital Steel & Pipe Pty Limited [2007] FCA 1319
TRADE PRACTICES – CONSUMER PROTECTION – UNCONSCIONABLE CONDUCT – Application for interlocutory injunctions – where contract for sale of goods – where seller beneficiary under irrevocable documentary letter of credit – where third-party bank assignee of proceeds under letter of credit – where third-party bank relied upon assignment – where goods alleged to be defective – where seller alleged knowingly to have delivered defective goods – where seller purported to draw down on letter of credit – where seller not able to repay amounts drawn down – whether serious question to be tried that goods defective – whether serious question to be tried that seller engaged in trade or commerce in conduct that is unconscionable within the meaning of the unwritten law contrary to s 51AA Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) – whether s 51AA an exception to the autonomy principle – whether alleged conduct capable of constituting unconscionable conduct as a matter of law – whether serious question to be tried of facts alleged – whether interest of third-party bank prevents relief from being granted – whether balance of convenience favours relief.
Held:- serious question to be tried that goods defective – no serious question to be tried that seller engaged in conduct that is unconscionable contrary to s 51AA – balance of convenience favours refusal of relief – application dismissed.
Bank of New South Wales Act 1850 (NSW) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 23 Federal Court Rules O 25A, r 5(5) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 51AA, s 52
Australian Broadcasting Authority v Lenah Game Meats Pty Limited (2001) 208 CLR 199 referred to Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill (2006) 80 ALJR 1672 referred to Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v C G Berbatis Holdings Pty Ltd (No 2) (2000) 96 FCR 491 referred to Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Samton Holdings Pty Ltd (2002) 117 FCR 301 Boral Formwork and Scaffolding Pty Ltd v Action Makers Ltd (in administrative receivership) (2003) ATPR 41-953 referred to Cardile v LED Builders Pty Limited (1999) 198 CLR 380 referred to Ciavarella v Balmer (1983) 153 CLR 438 referred to Clough Engineering Limited v Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd [2007] FCA 881 referred to Clough Engineering Limited v Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (No 2) [2007] FCA 927 referred to Codelfa Construction Proprietary Limited v State Rail Authority of New South Wales (1982) 149 CLR 337 referred to Legione v Hateley (1983) 152 CLR 406 referred to Olex Focas Pty Ltd v Skodaexport Co Ltd [1998] 3 VR 380 referred to Stern v McArthur (1988) 165 CLR 489 referred to Tanwar Enterprises Pty Ltd v Cauchi (2003) 217 CLR 315 referred to United City Merchants (Investments) Limited v Royal Bank of Canada [1983] 1 AC 168 referred to
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate