Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Mitchelson v Health Insurance Commission & Ors [2007] FCA 1372 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to strike out a document described as a Notice of Appeal – consideration of whether the document is a proceeding – consideration of an application for leave to amend the initiating proceeding – consideration of the relationship between the initiating document and the requirements of a document seeking an Order of Review for the purposes of the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) – consideration of an order for indemnity costs – consideration of an order pursuant to Order 62 of the Federal Court Rules that costs be payable forthwith upon determination of the quantum of the costs notwithstanding that the proceeding is not concluded. Health Insurance Act 1973 (Cth), ss 86, 88A, 93, 95, ss 97-106F, 106KD, 106L, 106SA, 106T, 106TA, 106V(1), (2) Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977, ss 3, 5, 11 DR MARK LESLIE MITCHELSON v HEALTH INSURANCE COMMISSION, DR GEOFFREY HIRST, DR MARCELA COX, DR BRIAN MORTON, DR NICOLAS RADFORD, DR WILLIAM MEAGHER AND MS JANE PHELAN QUD128 OF 2007
GREENWOOD J
4 SEPTEMBER 2007
BRISBANE IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY QUD128 OF 2007
BETWEEN: DR MARK LESLIE MITCHELSON
Applicant
AND: HEALTH INSURANCE COMMISSION
First Respondent
DR GEOFFREY HIRST
As chairperson of the Professional Services Review Committee No 445
Second Respondent
DR MARCELA COX
As Member of the Professional Services Review Committee No 445
Third Respondent
DR BRIAN MORTON
As Member if the Professional Services Review Committee No 445
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate