Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NBKM v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 1413
MIGRATION – application for a protection visa – Tribunal's decision set aside – matter remitted to Tribunal – no second hearing – whether Tribunal was obliged to conduct a second hearing – whether issues in relation to the decision under review had changed Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 422B, 424A, 425, 428 SZEPZ v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCAFC 107 Liu v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2001) 113 FCR 541 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Wang (2003) 215 CLR 518 Abebe v Commonwealth (1999) 197 CLR 510 SZBEL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2006) 231 ALR 592 NBKM, NBKN AND NBKO v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP AND REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL NSD 315 OF 2007
SIOPIS J
10 september 2007
SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 315 OF 2007
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA BETWEEN: NBKM
First Appellant
NBKN
Second Appellant
NBKO
Third Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: SIOPIS J DATE OF ORDER: 10 SEPTEMBER 2007
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The name of the first respondent is varied to "Minister for Immigration and Citizenship". 2. The appeal is dismissed. 3. The appellants are to pay the first respondent's costs.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 315 OF 2007
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA BETWEEN: NBKM
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate