Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
British American Tobacco Australasia Limited v The Person Identified by the Australian Customs Service as "Gory Sabar" [2007] FCA 1417 BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO AUSTRALASIA LIMITED v THE PERSON IDENTIFIED BY THE AUSTRALIAN CUSTOMS SERVICE AS "GORY SABAR" NSD 1544 OF 2007
BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO AUSTRALASIA LIMITED v the person identified by the australian customs service as "GARY MUSSA"
NSD 1545 of 2007
STONE J
22 AUGUST 2007
SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1544 OF 2007
BETWEEN: BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO AUSTRALASIA LIMITED
Applicant
AND: THE PERSON IDENTIFIED BY THE AUSTRALIAN CUSTOMS SERVICE AS "GORY SABAR"
Respondent
JUDGE: STONE J DATE OF ORDER: 22 AUGUST 2007
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT:
1. GRANTS LEAVE to the applicant to file a Notice of Motion dated 22 August 2007 and supporting affidavit of Robert Anthony Arnold sworn 21 August 2007, returnable instanter before Justice Stone. 2. ORDERS pursuant to Order 19 rule 2(2)(d) that service of this Notice of Motion be dispensed with. 3. ORDERS pursuant to Order 35A rule 3(2)(d) that, in default of the respondent's appearance in the proceedings, final orders be made in the proceedings in the terms of orders 4 to 8 below. 4. ORDERS pursuant to section 137(3)(b) of the Trade Marks Act 1995, the goods listed in Schedule B (Seized Goods) be forfeited to the Commonwealth for disposal at the direction of the Chief Executive Officer of the Australian Customs Service. 5. ORDERS that the respondent by himself, his servants, agents or otherwise, be restrained from: a. manufacturing; b. importing; c. causing or procuring the manufacture or importation of; d. selling or offering or exposing for sale; e. advertising or promoting; or f. otherwise providing cigarettes, tobacco or tobacco products bearing: (i) one or more of the one or more of, the registered trade marks listed in Schedule A (Registered Trade Marks); or (ii) any mark which is substantially identical with or deceptively similar to any one or more of the Registered Trade Marks which have been applied without the consent of the applicant. 6. ORDERS that the respondent by himself, his servants, agents or otherwise, be restricted from authorising, aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring any other person or entity to engage in conduct prohibited by order 5. 7. ORDERS that the applicant be granted leave to use the documents produced by the Australian Customs Service in response to a subpoena issued on 7 August 2007 (and the information contained therein) for the purposes of investigating and pursuing further legal action against third parties. 8. ORDERS that the respondent pay the applicant's costs of the proceedings. 9. NOTES that the applicant no longer seeks any relief mentioned in the application filed in this matter other than that mentioned in these orders. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate