Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Rivera v The Commonwealth of Australia [2007] FCA 1465 HABEAS CORPUS – application for writ of habeas corpus – whether writ available where applicant does not argue detention unlawful – no arguable case for writ EXTRADITION – application for declaration that detention at correctional facility unlawful under Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) – whether Act imposes obligation to hold persons awaiting extradition in different manner to convicted persons – whether applicant can be moved from remand centre to correctional facility – whether NSW Act applies – definition of 'prison' for purposes of Act – no arguable case incarceration unlawful ORDER 80 – application for referral for pro bono assistance – no arguable basis for matters relied on – applicant presented case competently – order not appropriate Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 3, 4(1), 23, 225, 226 Extradition Act 1988 (Cth), ss 5, 19, 19(9), 22, 53 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 39B International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Arts 10, 14 Cabal v Secretary, Department of Justice (Victoria) (2000) 177 ALR 306 considered Dietrich v R (1992) 177 CLR 292 cited Re Officer in Charge of Cells, ACT Supreme Court; ex parte Eastman (1994) 123 ALR 478 cited Re Stanbridge's Application (1996) 70 ALJR 640 cited LAWRENCE JOHN RIVERA v THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA AND THE STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES NSD 1307 OF 2007
BENNETT J
17 SEPTEMBER 2007
SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SYDNEY DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1307 OF 2007
BETWEEN: LAWRENCE JOHN RIVERA
Applicant
AND: THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
First Respondent
THE STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Second Respondent
JUDGE: BENNETT J
DATE OF ORDER: 17 SEPTEMBER 2007
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate