Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Brother Industries, Ltd v Dynamic Supplies Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 1490 TRADE MARKS – infringement of registered trade marks – importing and selling goods packaged in counterfeit packaging constitutes 'use' of trade marks – construction of trade mark specifications – meaning of "consumables" – defence of consent – insufficient evidence to establish chain of supply started with manufacturer – consent of registered owner, not related entity in corporate group, must be acquired. TRADE PRACTICES – misleading and deceptive conduct and false representations – importing and selling goods packaged in counterfeit packaging is misleading and deceptive – intention not relevant – importing and selling goods packaged in counterfeit packaging constitutes passing off. TRADE PRACTICES – liability for sale of good not of merchantable quality – evidence of defectiveness required. WORDS AND PHRASES – "consumable"
Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth), ss 7(4), 9, 17, 20, 120, 123 Trade Marks Regulations 1995 (Cth), sch 1 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), ss 52, 53, 74D, 74H
Angoves Pty Ltd v Johnson (1982) 43 ALR 349 cited Butcher v Lachlan Elder Realty Pty Ltd (2004) 218 CLR 592 cited Campomar Sociedad, Limitada v Nike International Limited (2000) 202 CLR 45 considered Champagne Heidsieck et Cie Monopole Societe Anonyme v Buxton [1930] 1 Ch 330 cited Coca-Cola Co v All-Fect Distributors Ltd (1999) 96 FCR 107 considered Estex Clothing Manufacturers Pty Ltd v Ellis and Goldstein Ltd (1967) 116 CLR 254 considered Given v CV Holland (Holdings) Pty Ltd (1977) 29 FLR 212 cited Hornsby Building Information Centre Pty Ltd v Sydney Building Information Centre Ltd (1978) 140 CLR 216 cited Leeks v FXC Corporation (2002) 118 FCR 299 cited Mark Foys Pty Ltd v TVSN (Pacific) Ltd (2000) 104 FCR 61 considered Nokia Corporation v Truong (2006) 66 IPR 511 cited Pioneer v The Registrar of Trade Marks (1977) 137 CLR 670 considered Playboy Enterprises International Inc v Hong (2004) 63 IPR 533 considered R & A Bailey & Co Lt v Boccaccio Pty Ltd (1986) 4 NSWLR 701 considered Revlon Inc v Cripps and Lee [1980] FSR 85 cited Thunderbird Products Corp v Thunderbird Marine Product Pty Ltd (1974) 131 CLR 592 cited Transport Tyres Pty Ltd v Montana Tyres Rims and Tubes Pty Ltd (1999) 93 FCR 421 considered W.D. & H.O. Wills (Australia) Lrd v Rothmans Ltd (1956) 94 CLR 131 cited Blanco White TA and Jacobs R, Kerly's Law of Trade Marks and Trade Names (12th ed, Sweet & Maxwell, 1986) Davison M, Johnston K and Kennedy P, Shanahan's Australian Law of Trade Marks & Passing Off (3rd ed, Lawbook Co., 2003) BROTHER INDUSTRIES, LTD AND BROTHER INTERNATIONAL (AUST) PTY LTD (ACN 001 393 835) v DYNAMIC SUPPLIES PTY LTD (ACN 064 793 862) NSD 50 OF 2005
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate